Skip to content
Wednesday, 21 February , 2007 / ermes

“Il giuoco delle parti”


A proposito di politica estera, di pacifismi, bandiere, faziosità, democraticismi, solidarismi, marce militari o militaresche, anti-americanismi, pro-americanismi… A proposito di quanto accade in queste ore nel Belpaese, a proposito delle vagonate di gente coinvolte nel discutere dell’Italia centro del mondo, ombelico e fucina ove si forgia il destino dell’umanità (per inciso, in Afghanistan, la nostra missione consta di circa 1900 soldati, l’intero contingente Isaf-Nato è intorno alle 50000 unità, la popolazione assomma a quasi 30 milioni di persone), a proposito di quel processo di distorsione degli elementi minimi di comprensione della realtà, ad uso ed abuso di strumentalizzazioni politiche e ideologiche, che scatta ormai scontatamente su quasi ogni tema del giorno nel nostro Paese – che si parli (quando pur si parli) di Mafia, istruzione, infanzia, usura, finanza…

A proposito di tale carnevale… Avete mai sentito un comunista, un post-comunista, un democristiano, un post-demoscristiano, un missino, un post-missino etc. in questa nostra “commissariata Repubblica”, ormai vestita e malridotta a manto d’Arlecchino (giocosa e irresponsabile spartizione dei poteri a ogni livello), avete mai ascoltato, assistito ad inchieste, dibattiti, telegiornali, quotidiani, settimanali, dico un ufficio stampa, una Festa dell’Unità, una sagra di paese, un convegno universitario interrogarsi ed interessarsi al destino di popoli (un individuo più un individuo più un individuo più un individuo…) sotto il tacco di violenti dittatori autocrati superstiziosi iracondi affamatori plurimiliardari (in euro), con la stessa intensità, rabbia e foga che si spende per arrovellarsi sulle più stratosferiche e banali categorie somme del destino “politico”dell’universo tutto? Forse è questione di mio abbaglio, forse…

make_mugabe_history.jpgGoing nowhere
Feb 20th 2007
From Economist.com
Zimbabwe will only recover when Robert Mugabe goes

It’s still there, and just as bad as ever. The outside world has all but forgotten Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe continues to preside over economic and political collapse. But the southern African country is marking miserable milestones by the day. Four out of five adults are now unemployed. Zimbabwe suffers the world’s highest inflation rate, a stratospheric 1,600% and rising. Toilet paper is more valuable than bank notes. The price of bread (when it’s available) more than doubled in January; mealie meal, a staple, rose by 500% last week.
Price freezes mean that basics, like milk and sugar, are rarely available. Many recently printed bank notes have not been issued because they are already worthless. Roughly 3m people, by some estimates, have fled the country, leaving about 12m behind. On Monday February 19th the European Union—to little fanfare—agreed to renew “smart” sanctions, including an arms embargo and travel ban for Zimbabwe’s leadership, that have been in place for years.
The cause of Zimbabwe’s collapse, ultimately, is Mr Mugabe’s refusal to leave office. Increasingly under pressure from unhappy Zimbabweans, he has lashed out at an array of enemies, including black opposition leaders, white farmers, trade unions, women’s groups, urban voters and Britain—the former colonial power. By seizing commercial farms and handing them to political cronies, Mr Mugabe may have staved off the end of his political career, but at the cost of ruining an economy dominated by agriculture. Aid and investment have dried up. Manufacturing has slumped.
The prolonged economic collapse is more typical of a country wrecked by war. The purchasing power of the average Zimbabwean today, for example, is back at levels last seen soon after the second world war, according to the Centre for Global Development, a think-tank in Washington, DC. Given widespread AIDS and hunger, this translates into thousands of unncessary deaths each year.
When will anything be done about it? Weary analysts have stopped trying to predict how far the economy will have to collapse, or for oppression to worsen, before something snaps. But even leaders in the ruling ZANU-PF party know that recovery depends on getting the old crocodile out of office. Investors, farmers, refugees, tourists and others will not return while Mr Mugabe’s misrule continues. Yet managing his exit is proving impossible.
mugabediplomacy.jpgRival camps in the ruling party are vying for eventual control, so nobody dares push the chief to go. (Indeed Mr Mugabe may be dividing his allies for precisely this reason). The army is watching suspiciously. The big neighbour—South Africa—is reluctant to get involved, fearing that any intervention may backfire. The opposition, deflated after seeing general elections rigged and its supporters crushed, has become timid and divided. Many of the brightest and bravest, in any case, are moving abroad. Nor are sustained street protests likely, though there are occasional signs of violence in the townships around the capital, Harare. Strikes are becoming more common. At the weekend heavily armed riot police in Harare crushed an opposition rally—despite High Court approval for it to go ahead—by firing teargas and using water cannon. Protesters responded by throwing stones. Over 120 people were arrested.
This week, to mark his birthday, Mr Mugabe will have a lavish party, to which teachers and nurses have been forced to contribute. He will also give a speech in which he is expected to mention his succession. Officially, after nearly three decades in office, he is supposed to go in March 2008. But a presidential election scheduled for that month may well be postponed for another two years, when he will be 86. In any case he has told foreign journalists, perhaps in jest, that he plans to rule until he is “a century old”.
Is anything like that dismal prospect possible? Mr Mugabe is relatively healthy and alert, and has the tacit support of both other African countries and of China, which is asserting itself on the continent. And though outsiders occasionally grumble about the misery in Zimbabwe—America has called it an “outpost of tyranny”—the West has broadly decided that ignoring Mr Mugabe is the least bad strategy. Any change, therefore, is going to have to come from within. And, so far, Mr Mugabe has proved a master at stamping that out.

3 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. ermes / Feb 22 2007 12:19 PM

    (Ho terminato di scriver tutto appena due minuti prima di sapere che Mr. D’Alema era stato battuto al Senato…)

  2. ermes / Mar 17 2007 12:33 PM

    Dal Corsera, edizione di venerdì 16 marzo, 2007 – ripeto 2007!:

    “HARARE – «Impiccatevi»: è la risposta del presidente dello Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe ai leader occidentali che hanno criticato la repressione di proteste dell’opposizione avvenuta nei giorni scorsi nel Paese. Per Mugabe, gli arresti e i pestaggi in carcere di esponenti del Movimento per il Cambiamento Democratico sarebbero stati «resi necessari dal ricorso alla violenza degli stessi arrestati, che tramavano di rovesciare la presidenza».”

    Vien da chiedersi quanti italiani si sentiranno chiamati in causa…

    Notazione a margine: sarebbe davvero opportuno cominciare a non definir più mere proteste quelle che sono lotte sulla/e vita/e e sulla/e morte/i.

Trackbacks

  1. Silenzi « Abeona forum

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: